Naked in Death by J.D.Robb
Last week, Victoria over at Tales from the Reading Room wrote a post about Obsession in Death, the latest in J.D.Robb’s long-running crime series featuring detective Eve Dallas. In fact, it turns out that Obsession in Death is the fiftieth in the series! I knew that I had the first novel in the sequence somewhere on my shelves, and felt compelled to dig it out and see how Dallas began…
As Victoria said, Robb/Roberts is known for her philanthropy which is lovely. She is also known for being a writing machine, producing countless novels each year, romances as Roberts, crime as Robb. Naked in Death was published in 1995 – the first of fifty, so that’s two or three per year of this series alone.
Eve Dallas is thirty. She’s a Lieutenant in the NYPSD (the ‘S’ is for Security). At the start of the novel she is called out to a murder – it turns out to be the grand-daughter of a senator who is running for his party nomination on a ‘moral’ ticket. His grand-daughter in one of those f***-you type career choices has been working as a ‘licenced companion’ – a prostitute. The scene is grisly – she was killed with 3 bullets from a hand-gun. There’s a note under the body saying 1 of 6.
Naturally, the senator is all over the department wanting to keep things closed down, but Dallas knows there may be more deaths – and there will be. The killer seems to be expert at bypassing security systems and leaving no trace, but in true psychopath style he sends Dallas videos.
One of the immediate suspects is Roarke, an Irishman. He’s a tycoon, he owns the building she was killed in, he collects guns – which are now antiques. He has to be a suspect – if only he wasn’t so sexy – because you just know that Dallas and him will end up in the sack for some truly purple prose – lancing spears and all that!
Enough of the plot, for it was entirely predictable, I guessed whodunnit halfway in, but the pieces didn’t fall into place until later.
You don’t really read series like this for the crimes. They’re incidental, you read them for the characters. You hope for some development – and reading between the lines in Victoria’s review I can surmise that apart from Dallas and Roarke ending up married, that little has changed in fifty books. However: Naked is set in 2058; Obsession is set in 2060. So these fifty books move forward just two years. My – that’s a full case-book of murders for anyone!
Note that near-future timeline. In 2058, guns have been outlawed, become collectors items only. Prostitutes have become legal, licenced. Various gadgets make modern life easier, but as far as I could see offer no improvements in quality of life. None but the rich can afford real coffee. Roarke is planning a space resort – so Richard Branson may continue to dream on. Yet, it’s all too familiar – in a way it’s not futuristic enough in its detail. Apart from the guns, there seemed no need to set it in the future, and even now there are collectors of old firearms – the perp could have used contemporary collectibles.
What of Dallas and Roarke? Well she is of course a feisty superwoman, and Roarke may as well be a superman, not so much Clarke Kent, but Bruce Wayne – his money can buy him anything. Dallas is damaged goods, abused as a child – holding it all in ever since. Roarke is a chancer who hit lucky and made enough money to go legit. She is a good policewoman with the appropriate contempt for authority and is not afraid to bend the rules. He is just sickening – too handsome, too rich, too lovey, too much!
So there we have it. Naked in Death combines crime with a steamy romance. I liked the crime part, and squirmed a bit with the romance. As a whole, I enjoyed reading Naked in Death in exactly the same way as I enjoyed reading The Da Vinci Code. With no expectations, it was very easy to read throwaway grisly fun. (5.5/10)
* * * * *
Source: Own copy.
To explore further on Amazon UK, please click below (affiliate link – thank you):
Naked In Death: 1, Glory In Death: 2 etc by J.D. Robb. Piatkus paperbacks, around 400 pages.
8 thoughts on “The first in a long line of crime novels”
Sounds like a loak of hokum really! At least having read yours and Victoria’s reviews I know I don’t need to spend any time on this series! 🙂
I’m about to start reading a biggie – hint above right – and am slightly scared as with all much-hyped novels about starting it – so this little diversion thanks to Victoria was fun!
Sometimes a crime book is all you need! As for the Ishiguro – I confess to never having read any of his books, which is shameful (though I do own “An Artist of the Floating World”. Look forward to hearing what you think!
Loved this review! I enjoyed the crime elements a lot more than the romance and joined you in the squirming, and the preposterousness of Rourke. You’ve put your finger on my confusion over the futuristic parts, too – you’re right, they aren’t quite enough to justify the setting. But it’s still impressive to think she can write three of these a year!
Thanks – I just had to go and pull it off the shelf after your review. What got me was the compressed timeline – those 50 books are set over the course of just 2 or so years – I’d have liked Dallas and Roarke to grow old together by vol 50! 🙂
I would have squirmed with the romance too–good way of putting it.
Although this book was as grisly as any crime novel, the romance element definitely puts towards the women’s popular fiction camp. 🙂
These are my favorite little escapist books. I see each new one like a piece of candy–it’s sweet and gone quickly.